RESUMO
Background: Urinary retention remains a frequent postoperative complication, associated with patient discomfort and delayed discharge following general thoracic surgery (GTS). We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a predictive model of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) among GTS patients. Methods: We retrospectively developed a predictive model using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons GTS Database at our institution. The patient study cohort included adults undergoing elective in-patient surgical procedures without a history of renal failure or Foley catheter on entry to the recovery suite (August 2013 to March 2017). Multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with urinary retention, and a nomogram to aid medical decision making was developed. The predictive model was validated in a cohort of GTS patients between April 2017 and November 2018 using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The predictive model was developed from 1484 GTS patients, 284 of whom (19%) experienced postoperative urinary retention within 24 hours of the operation. Risk factors for POUR included older age, male sex, higher preoperative creatinine, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, primary diagnosis, primary procedure, and use of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. A logistic nomogram for estimating the risk of POUR was created and validated in 646 patients, 65 of whom (10%) had urinary retention. The ROC curves of development and validation models had similar favorable c-statistics (0.77 vs 0.72; P > .05). Conclusions: Postoperative urinary retention occurs in nearly 20% of patients undergoing major GTS. Using a validated predictive model may help by targeting certain patients with prophylactic measures to prevent this complication.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the overall gender gap in medicine is narrowing, significant gender disparities remain in the cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) field; women represent only 7% of practicing surgeons and 20% of residents. The purpose of this study was to identify gender differences in CTS exposure and interest among fourth year medical students applying to general surgery residency. METHODS: An anonymous survey was emailed to general surgery residency applicants at a major academic program for the 2019 and 2020 application cycles. Data were stratified by gender and analyzed using the χ2 and t tests. RESULTS: Of the 303 responders to the survey, 44% were women. A total of 58% of women were unlikely to be interested in or were definitely not interested in pursuing a career in CTS compared with 35% of men (P < .05). Men were 2.5 times more likely than women to be interested in CTS (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 4.1). More men had rotated through CTS (55% vs 44%; P = .04) and shadowed a cardiothoracic surgeon (41% vs 29%; P = .03). More than 30% of women interested in CTS reported mentorship as the most important factor in their decision. Mentorship and CTS rotations were both independently associated with CTS interest after adjusting for gender. CONCLUSIONS: Interest in CTS is disappointingly low among women and represents a troublesome disparity that must be addressed. Early exposure to CTS and more mentorship from cardiothoracic surgeons are critical to reverse the current trend. Further studies are necessary to determine factors limiting female exposure to CTS rotations and dissuading female applicants from pursuing careers in CTS.
